Difficult Word/ Phrase | Contextual Sense |
Wary | Marked by keen caution and watchful prudence |
Revanchism | The political policy of retaliating to regain lost territory |
Bar | Disallow |
Pave the way | to make it easier for (something to happen or someone to do something) |
Consonance | agreement with something |
Plaintiff | a person who brings an action in a court of law |
Deity | Any supernatural being worshipped as controlling some part of the world or some aspect of life or who is the personification of a force |
Concert | Harmony of people’s opinions, actions or characters |
Underhand | Marked by deception |
Facade | A showy misrepresentation intended to conceal something unpleasant |
Toehold | any means of gaining access, support, etc |
Pendency | the quality or state of being undecided, or in continuance; suspense |
Vitiation | Nullification by the destruction of the legal force; rendering null |
Stem | Stop the flow of a liquid |
Stoke | Stir up or tend |
In tandem | One behind the other |
Frenzy | State of violent mental agitation |
Unregenerate | Unrepentant and incapable of being reformed |
Abominable | Exceptionally bad or displeasing |
Aftermath | The consequences of an event (especially a catastrophic event) |
Spawn | Call forth |
Hindu revanchism (The political policy of retaliating to regain lost territory) has found a way to use the legal route to record early success in its latest communal campaign. The district court in Varanasi has rejected objections to the maintainability of a suit filed by five Hindu devotees seeking the right of daily worship at a spot in the Gyanvapi mosque. Of particular significance is that the court ruled that the suit is not prohibited by the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, which freezes the status of places of worship as it was on August 15, 1947 and bars (disallow) suits that seek to change their character. On the fact of it, the ruling only paves the way (to make it easier for (something to happen or someone to do something)) for the suit to be heard and is in consonance (agreement with something) with law. The plaintiffs (a person who brings an action in a court of law) have argued that the spot had the status of a Hindu temple on that day and ever since, and that the suit does not seek to convert a mosque into a temple; on the other hand, they are only demanding the right to worship deities (Any supernatural being worshipped as controlling some part of the world or some aspect of life or who is the personification of a force) in the complex. If limited to this assertion of a religious and customary right, the suit may indeed not be barred by the 1991 law. However, it is a matter of concern that the ruling is also grounded in other claims that appear to question the mosque’s status. For instance, the court says records produced by the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee were not enough to show that the complex was Waqf property. This appears in concert (Harmony of people’s opinions, actions or characters) with the Hindu side’s claim that Muslims were “encroachers”, an assertion that clearly makes it a dispute aimed at converting the property’s status.
Courts should be wary of underhand (Marked by deception) designs behind the legal facade (A showy misrepresentation intended to conceal something unpleasant) that such litigation builds to gain a toehold (any means of gaining access, support, etc.) right that can be incrementally expanded. The mere pendency (the quality or state of being undecided, or in continuance; suspense) of some kinds of religious disputes can contribute to the vitiation (Nullification by the destruction of the legal force; rendering null) of peace and harmony. It is now clear that the enactment of a special law to freeze the status of places of worship and prohibit litigation over inter-religious disputes over their location has not stemmed (Stop the flow of a liquid) the Hindu right-wing’s obsession with targeting mosques and stoking (Stir up or tend) communal passions. It is no surprise that the latest efforts to raise civil and legal disputes involving the Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi and the Shahi Idgah Mosque in Mathura are being made in tandem (One behind the other) with a campaign against the Places of Worship Act. Several petitions have been filed challenging its validity. That such a campaign goes on despite the experience of communal frenzy (State of violent mental agitation) through the 1990s shows the unregenerate (Unrepentant and incapable of being reformed) nature of majoritarian forces. The abominable (Exceptionally bad or displeasing) destruction of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya, the communal riots that took place in its aftermath (The consequences of an event (especially a catastrophic event)), the serial bomb blasts in Mumbai, and the fundamentalist violence that the sequence of events spawned (Call forth) cannot be forgotten. It is unfortunate that an atmosphere has been created in which the political leadership can encourage divisive litigation and exploit the process, if not influence the outcome.
Want to improve your vocabulary further? Download the Lists of Word-Meanings of Previous Months here.
In this blog, we have provided the complete details related to the RRB ALP 2024…
Get the Hindu Editorial Vocabulary for 22th November & discover the toughest words and their…
SBI PO 2024 Notification will be released soon on its official website. Read on to…
The Union Bank LBO Syllabus 2024 has been released on the official website, Candidates can…
Explore our blog "How to Score 50+ Marks in Data Analysis and Interpretation for Union…
Cover all the topics via RRB ALP Study Plan 2024 for CBT 1 exam by…