Difficult Word/ Phrase | Contextual Sense |
Gambit | A tactic or manoeuvre intended to gain an advantage |
Mandarin | a person who has a very important job in the government, and who is sometimes considered to be too powerful |
Sum up | Give a summary |
Deem | Keep in mind or convey as a conviction or view |
Medley | a mixture of different things |
Propensity | An inclination to do something |
Conspicuous | Obvious to the eye or mind |
Alluring | Highly attractive and able to arouse hope or desire |
Nuance | A subtle difference in meaning, opinion or attitude |
Embedded | attached |
Prudent | Careful and sensible; marked by sound judgment |
Cope | Succeed in doing, achieving, or producing (something) with the limited or inadequate means available |
Leg-up | an act of helping someone or something to improve their situation |
Con | Deprive of by deceit |
Nudge | something that encourages or persuades someone to do something in a gentle way |
Penury | A state of extreme poverty or destitution |
Much ink has been spilled by now on the Budget’s hike in the tax-free ceiling under the new income-tax system introduced in 2020, to ₹7 lakh from ₹5 lakh, with lower tax rates for those who give up existing tax exemptions. Experts outline varying arithmetic to determine at what levels of income and savings taxpayers should consider to switch to the new “default” regime. The Opposition has raised concerns that the government eventually wants to do away with the exemptions that “give some social security to the middle class” altogether. Industry captains are worried this may affect the savings rate and hit investments. So far, government mandarins (a person who has a very important job in the government, and who is sometimes considered to be too powerful) have said, among other things, that the savings rate would not be affected; lower income earners do not save enough to avail the tax exemptions and end up paying higher rates. “As an adult, you have to be the best judge on what suits you,” Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman summed up (Give a summary) on Saturday. All of them are individually valid arguments. However, the bigger picture needs to factor in that many are not in a position to be the best judge for themselves — especially not the lower income earners who the government believes will benefit the most in the new tax system.
India’s literacy and financial literacy levels mean many taxpayers cannot deem (Keep in mind or convey as a conviction or view) the right mix of consumption and savings, leave alone directing savings into an appropriate medley (a mixture of different things) of safe as well as inflation-beating investments. Adult humans do not behave as rationally as economists would assume. For instance, there is a propensity (An inclination to do something) towards more conspicuous (Obvious to the eye or mind) consumption among the youth who may find the new tax regime with higher take-home salaries alluring (Highly attractive and able to arouse hope or desire). Financial products are routinely mis-sold to those not equipped to understand market nuances (A subtle difference in meaning, opinion or attitude) and the risks embedded (attached) in fine print. In a country that cannot yet provide universal social security and health benefits, the old exemption-based regime helps guide families towards some level of prudent (Careful and sensible; marked by sound judgment) asset allocation to cope (Succeed in doing, achieving, or producing (something) with the limited or inadequate means available) with life’s uncertainties, with a leg-up (an act of helping someone or something to improve their situation) for building a critical asset over their working lives — a roof over their head. India’s retail participation in stocks may have risen in recent years, but not everyone can handle the risks of equity markets or avoid being conned (Deprive of by deceit) by influencer-operators. So the nudge (something that encourages or persuades someone to do something in a gentle way) away from the old tax regime must be accompanied by greater financial literacy efforts from the government and regulators and a crackdown on unethical selling practices that could lead to people ending up in penury (A state of extreme poverty or destitution). If people did not need the government’s prodding to act in their own best interest, there would have been no need for mandatory contributions to provident funds and pensions.
Want to improve your vocabulary further? Download the Lists of Word-Meanings of Previous Months here.
In this blog, we have provided the complete details related to the RRB ALP 2024…
Get the Hindu Editorial Vocabulary for 22th November & discover the toughest words and their…
SBI PO 2024 Notification will be released soon on its official website. Read on to…
The Union Bank LBO Syllabus 2024 has been released on the official website, Candidates can…
Explore our blog "How to Score 50+ Marks in Data Analysis and Interpretation for Union…
Cover all the topics via RRB ALP Study Plan 2024 for CBT 1 exam by…