We hope you are getting some help from the series of Editorial Analysis that we do. This aims to help you understand the editorials of prominent publications.
Waiting for reforms: On the economic stimuli
The stimulus incentives hold promise, but structural reforms are nowhere on the horizon
People who have been yearning (to wish very strongly) for major economic reforms from the Narendra Modi government, it seems, will have to wait to have their dreams come true. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Saturday presented the third round of stimulus (Something that causes growth or activity) measures to resuscitate (to bring something back to life) the struggling economy, but once again these have largely failed to live up to the initial hype (intensive publicity) around them. The previous two rounds of the stimulus plan, presented at press conferences held by the Minister over the last few weeks, focused primarily on reviving (to start to grow or develop to become successful again) the automobile sector, boosting the confidence of foreign investors who were spooked (frightened) by the Budget announcements in July, and improving the health of dangerously fragile (easily harmed, damaged) state-owned banks by doing everything short of privatising them. This time around the focus has been on helping out the underperforming export and real estate sectors through piecemeal (characterized by unsystematic partial measures taken over a period of time) fiscal reforms. Among other things, Ms. Sitharaman announced a new tax refund scheme and greater priority sector lending for the export sector to incentivise exports. It is expected that the new tax breaks to the exports sector will cause a dent of up to ₹50,000 crore to the government’s revenue. Further, external commercial borrowing norms have been eased to make it easier for Indian real estate companies to tap funds from abroad, and funds worth ₹10,000 crore have also been allocated to aid the completion of affordable housing projects. With lack of demand and major supply-side bottlenecks (a problem that delays progress) being the primary issues facing exports and real estate, it is doubtful whether the present measures will be enough to revive these flailing ( to move energetically in an uncontrolled way) sectors.
Overall, cutting across all three stimulus rounds announced till date, the government has been relying almost entirely on providing fiscal relief, in the form of tax cuts coupled with a tiny amount of government spending, to wade through what seems like a structural crisis in the economy. The hope seems to be that these measures combined with a looser monetary policy (actions taken by a government to control the amount of money in an economy) stance adopted by the RBI will boost spending and revive growth. This is, however, a far cry from what many expected from a government that promised radical (advocating a thorough social change) structural reforms when it rose to power in 2014. Without enacting any major supply-side reforms like land and labour reforms that can raise potential growth, it is also hard to see how greater spending can raise growth for very long. The government may believe that the present slowdown, marked by five consecutive quarters of dropping growth, is merely a cyclical (occurring in cycles) one. But given the size of its victory in two consecutive elections, the government should aim higher by trying to push through long-pending structural reforms that can raise India’s growth trajectory (the course that the growth follows over time) to the next level.
We hope such editorials that are being done on regular basis shall prove a good help to all the aspirants, especially those who are struggling with the English section in this exam season. If you have any feedback to share with us related to these articles, please do so in the comments section below.